Show that the cube roots of three distinct prime numbers cannot be three terms (not necessarily consecutive) of an arithmetic progression.
Problem
Source: 1973 USAMO Problem 5
Tags: geometry, 3D geometry, number theory, prime numbers, arithmetic sequence
07.03.2010 06:10
Suppose the contrary; and let $ \sqrt {p}, \sqrt {q}, \sqrt {r}$ be three distinct terms of an arithmetic progression, where $ p, q, r$ are primes. Then $ \sqrt {p} - \sqrt{q} = md$ and $ \sqrt {q} - \sqrt {r} = nd$ where $ m, n \in Z$ and $ d$ is the common difference. Then $ \frac {\sqrt {p} - \sqrt {q}}{\sqrt {q} - \sqrt {r}} = \frac {m}{n} = k \in Q$ $ \Longrightarrow \sqrt {p} + k\sqrt {r} = (k + 1)\sqrt {q}$ $ \Longrightarrow p + 2k\sqrt {pr} + k^2r = (k + 1)^2q$ $ \Longrightarrow \sqrt {pr} = \frac {(k + 1)^2q - p - k^2r}{2k} \in Q$ Which is a contradiction, because $ pr$ is not a perfect square, and then $ \sqrt{pr}$ is irrational
07.03.2010 06:44
Your solution might be right for square roots but is not true for a cube root which is clearly said in the problem.
07.03.2010 19:34
The solution is nearly identical...
30.03.2012 02:02
08.04.2020 04:12
@above I think your solution has a flaw in it. You assumed that d, the common difference, is an integer, but that need not be the case. Also you have a typo, you said that: cuberoot(p_1) + ad = p_2 and cuberoot(p_2) + bd = p_3, (this minor typo does not affect the solution) it should really be: cuberoot(p_1) + ad = cuberoot(p_2) and cuberoot(p_2) + bd = cuberoot(p_3)
13.04.2023 07:11
Let $ \sqrt[3]{p}=a$, $ \sqrt[3]{q}=a+md$, and $ \sqrt[3]{r}=a+nd$, where $ p,q,r$ are distinct primes and $ m,n$ are integers. $ \frac{\sqrt[3]{q}-\sqrt[3]{p}}{\sqrt[3]{r}-\sqrt[3]{p}} = \frac{m}{n}$, or \[ m\sqrt[3]{r} - n\sqrt[3]{q} = (m-n)\sqrt[3]{p}.\] Cubing this yields \[ m^3r - n^3q - 3mn \sqrt[3]{rq} (m\sqrt[3]{r}-n\sqrt[3]{q})=(m-n)^3p,\]but the LHS has an irrational number, namely $(rq)^{1/3}(mr^{1/3}-nq^{1/3})$, since r^2q and rq^2 are not perfect cubes.