Prove that there exist infinitely many positive integers $ n$ such that $ p = nr,$ where $ p$ and $ r$ are respectively the semiperimeter and the inradius of a triangle with integer side lengths.
Problem
Source: IMO Shortlist 2000, N5
Tags: Diophantine equation, number theory, inradius, perimeter, Triangle, IMO Shortlist
25.06.2010 00:18
11.07.2010 20:56
Here's my solution... If we let $x,y,z$ be the distances from the vertices to their respective tangency points with the incircle, then we want to find infinitely many $n$ such that solutions to \[(x+y+z)^3=n^2xyz\]exist. After playing around with this a bit we think to try $x=k(y+z)$ and then $k=yz-1$ so \[n^2=\frac{(x+y+z)^3}{xyz}=\frac{(yz)^3(y+z)^3}{(yz-1)(y+z)yz}=(yz)^2\frac{(y+z)^2}{yz-1}.\]It suffices to find some fixed value of $t$ so that \[t^2=\frac{(y+z)^2}{yz-1}\]has infinitely many integer solutions since then we would have $n=yzt$ with infinitely many values. Indeed, $t=3$ works since for \[9=t^2=\frac{(y+z)^2}{yz-1}\Longleftrightarrow y^2-7yz+(z^2+9)=0\]we can take \[y=\frac{7z+\sqrt{(7z)^2-4(z^2+9)}}{2}=\frac{7z+3\sqrt{5z^2-4}}{2},\]which has infinitely many solutions from the Pell Equation $w^2=5z^2-4$. Note that as $z$ increases, so does $y$, so $n=yzt=3yz$ does take on infinitely many values, and we are done.
10.08.2012 07:21
Let F_n be the n-th Fibonacci Sequence. When we set \[x=3F_{2n+1}^{3},\: y=F_{2n-1},\: z=F_{2n+3},\] \[\frac{(x+y+z)^{3}}{xyz}=\frac{(3F_{2n+1}(F_{2n+1}^{2}+1))^{3}}{3F_{2n+1}^{3}(F_{2n+1}^{2}+1)}=(3(F_{2n+1}^{2}+1))^{2}.\] \[(\: \because F_{2n-1}+F_{2n+3}=3F_{2n+1}\: \: and \: \: F_{2n-1}F_{2n+3}=F_{2n+1}^{2}+1)\]
31.10.2015 18:42
The above solution is motivated by Vieta Jumping, if anyone was curious. Its quite clean: Observe that the condition rearranges to $(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c) | (a+b+c)^3$. Now, WLOG $a+b-c = 1$, so $c = a+b-1$. Now we need $(2a-1)(2b-1) | (2(a+b)-1)^2$, and let $2a-1 = x$ and $2b-1 = y$. Now we've got some condition like $xy | (x+y-1)^2$. If we let $x$ and $y$ be $a^2$ and $b^2$, we want to have $\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{ab}$ be an integer, which is easy through vieta jumping.
03.01.2016 15:15
Please review my solution: $\frac{p}{r}=n$ We also know that $s*r=\triangle$ $\Longrightarrow$ $\frac{p^2}{\triangle}=n$ and ${r^2}*{\triangle}=n$ $\Longrightarrow$ $n$ depends on $p,r,\triangle$ for which there are infinite choices.Hence we can find infintely many $n$.
04.01.2016 16:27
Well, as I know this is IMO SL But I don't remember the year
05.01.2016 02:22
toto1234567890 wrote: Well, as I know this is IMO SL But I don't remember the year If you just scroll up to the top, you will see that this says "IMO Shortlist 2000, N5"...
05.01.2016 12:06
trumpeter wrote: toto1234567890 wrote: Well, as I know this is IMO SL But I don't remember the year If you just scroll up to the top, you will see that this says "IMO Shortlist 2000, N5"... Oh, sorry.
05.01.2016 12:32
va2010 wrote: The above solution is motivated by Vieta Jumping, if anyone was curious. Its quite clean: Observe that the condition rearranges to $(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c) | (a+b+c)^3$. Now, WLOG $a+b-c = 1$, so $c = a+b-1$. Now we need $(2a-1)(2b-1) | (2(a+b)-1)^2$, and let $2a-1 = x$ and $2b-1 = y$. Now we've got some condition like $xy | (x+y-1)^2$. If we let $x$ and $y$ be $a^2$ and $b^2$, we want to have $\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{ab}$ be an integer, which is easy through vieta jumping. Is the condition $(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c) | (a+b+c)^3$ just sufficient? I am getting $\frac{(a+b+c)^3}{(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}=n^2$ which I believe is not the same thing. Also i think that by your statement we can only conclude that there are infinite values of $a,b$ but we can't say anything about $n$. If i am wrong , can you please explain the solution to me?
05.01.2016 14:31
dbz wrote: Please review my solution: $\frac{p}{r}=n$ We also know that $s*r=\triangle$ $\Longrightarrow$ $\frac{p^2}{\triangle}=n$ and ${r^2}*{\triangle}=n$ $\Longrightarrow$ $n$ depends on $p,r,\triangle$ for which there are infinite choices.Hence we can find infintely many $n$. You must notice that $p,r,\triangle$ are not completely independent of each other. They all depend upon the sides of the triangles and whether $\frac{p^2}{\triangle }$ is an integer or not. So your solution is wrong.
07.01.2016 03:10
the_executioner wrote: va2010 wrote: The above solution is motivated by Vieta Jumping, if anyone was curious. Its quite clean: Observe that the condition rearranges to $(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c) | (a+b+c)^3$. Now, WLOG $a+b-c = 1$, so $c = a+b-1$. Now we need $(2a-1)(2b-1) | (2(a+b)-1)^2$, and let $2a-1 = x$ and $2b-1 = y$. Now we've got some condition like $xy | (x+y-1)^2$. If we let $x$ and $y$ be $a^2$ and $b^2$, we want to have $\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{ab}$ be an integer, which is easy through vieta jumping. Is the condition $(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c) | (a+b+c)^3$ just sufficient? I am getting $\frac{(a+b+c)^3}{(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}=n^2$ which I believe is not the same thing. Also i think that by your statement we can only conclude that there are infinite values of $a,b$ but we can't say anything about $n$. If i am wrong , can you please explain the solution to me? You are right. I wasn't thinking clearly But the ending is still quite similar.
06.08.2020 19:24
Claim. The Pell equation \[ x^2 - 5y^2 = -4 \]has infinitely many solutions in integers $(x_k, y_k)$, one set of which can be described by the recursive relation $(x_1, y_1) = (4,2)$ and \[ \begin{cases} x_{k+1} = 9x_k + 20y_k \\ y_{k+1} = 4x_k + 9y_k . \end{cases} \] Proof. We proceed by induction on $n$ that the recursive relation produces $(x_k, y_k)$ which satisfy the Pell equation. The base case $k=1$ is a simple computation. For the inductive step, we just expand \begin{align*} x_{k+1}^2 - 5y_{k+1}^2 &= (9x_k + 20y_k)^2 -5(4x_k + 9y_k)^2 \\ &= (81x_k^2 + 360 x_k y_k + 400y_k^2) - (80x_k^2 + 360x_ky_k + 405y_k^2) \\ &= x_k^2 - 5y_k^2 = -4. \end{align*}The recursive relation clearly produces increasing sequences $(x_k)$ and $(y_k)$, so we are done. Let $A,B,C$ be the side-lengths of the triangle and conduct a Ravi substitution such that $A = b+c, B = c+a,$ and $C = a+b$. Now set \begin{align*} a &= \frac{3y_k + \sqrt{9y_k^2 - 4(y_k^2 + 1)}}{2} = \frac{3y_k + x_k}{2} \\ b &= 3y_k - a \\ c &= (ab-1) (a+b) \end{align*}Trivially, $x_k$ and $y_k$ are the same parity by induction, so these three quantities are all integers. Obviously $s = a + b + c$. We also know that $[ABC] = sr$. Using Heron's formula, this implies $r = \sqrt{\frac{abc}{a+b+c}}$. Thus \[ n^2 = \frac{(a+b+c)^3}{abc}. \]Now, we just directly substitute to solve for $n$: \begin{align*} n^2 &= \frac{(ab)^3(a+b)^3}{ab(ab-1)(a+b)} \\ &= \frac{(ab)^2(a+b)^2}{ab-1} \\ &= \frac{(ab)^2(3y_k)^2}{y_k^2}, \end{align*}with the final equality coming from \[ ab - 1 = \frac{3y_k + x_k}{2} \cdot \frac{3y_k - x_k}{2} -1 = \frac{9y_k^2 - x_k^2 -4}{4} = y_k^2. \]Thus \[ n = 3ab = \frac{3(9y_k^2 - x_k^2)}{4} = 3y_k^2 + 3 \]As we vary $k$, this produces infinite and increasing (so distinct) $n$, so we are done.
08.10.2020 20:33
Can someone check? Seems too easy Search for right angle triangles with legs $a,b$ and hypotenuse $c$. Then we know $\frac{a+b+c}{2}=\frac{2S}{a+b+c}$ which implies $\frac{(a+b+c)^2}{4}=\frac{abn}{2}$. After simplifying we get $2a^2+2b^2+2ab+\sqrt{a^2+b^2}(2a+2b)=2abn$. For some pythagorean triplet $a=3x,b=4x,c=5x$ we get $72x^2=12xn$ which implies $6x=n$ for any $x$ which implies infinite possibilities for n.
08.10.2020 21:04
DanjelZone wrote: For some pythagorean triplet $a=3x,b=4x,c=5x$ we get $72x^2=12xn$ which implies $6x=n$ for any $x$ which implies infinite possibilities for n. The right hand side is actually $12x^2$, so you only get $n=6$ from this. (Intuitively, your solution can't work because the value of $n$ is invariant under scaling.)
24.03.2023 21:51