Let $G$ be a graph with $400$ vertices. For any edge $AB$ we call a cuttlefish the set of all edges from $A$ and $B$ (including $AB$). Each edge of the graph is assigned a value of $1$ or $-1$. It is known that the sum of edges at any cuttlefish is greater than or equal to $1$. Prove that the sum of the numbers at all edges is at least $-10^4$.
Problem
Source: Saint Petersburg MO 2020 Grade 9 Problem 7
Tags: combinatorics
07.05.2020 23:49
XbenX wrote: For any edge $AB$ we call a cuttlefish the set of all edges from $A$ and $B$ (including $AB$). What does this mean? Does it mean the set of edges incident to at least one of $A$ or $B$?
07.05.2020 23:53
XbenX wrote: Let $G$ be a graph with $400$ vertices. For any edge $AB$ we call a cuttlefish the set of all edges from $A$ and $B$ (including $AB$). Each edge of the graph is assigned a value of $1$ or $-1$. It is known that the sum of edges at any cuttlefish is greater than or equal to $1$. Prove that the sum of the numbers at all edges is at least $10^4$. I don't think this is the correct statement. Consider a linear graph with $400$ vertices, and a $1$ at every edge. Then the value of every cuttlefish is $\ge 2$, and the sum over all edges is $399$, unless I am miscomputing.
08.05.2020 02:53
Maybe the graph is complete?
08.05.2020 10:37
The statement is ok, I checked the Russian text. A cuttlefish is the set of edges incident to $A$ or $B$ (providing $AB$ is an edge). The example in #3 doesn't contradict to the statement since $399>-10000$. In other words it should be proved the negative edges couldn't be too many.
08.05.2020 14:38
dgrozev wrote: The statement is ok, I checked the Russian text. A cuttlefish is the set of edges incident to $A$ or $B$ (providing $AB$ is an edge). The example in #3 doesn't contradict to the statement since $399>-10000$. In other words it should be proved the negative edges couldn't be too many. There was a negative sign missing in the statement (as can be seen in the quote in my post), which has now been corrected
22.05.2020 01:10
Please tell me I'm not high Choose the largest matching $M = \{v_1-w_1,v_2-w_2,\dots v_n-w_n\}$ in the graph. Let $N$ be the set of vertices not in $M$, then $N$ is an independent set. If $N = \emptyset$ then summing along edges $v_iw_i$, each edge's weight is counted twice except for those joining a pair in $M$, so the total edge sum is $\ge \frac{n - n}{2} = 0 \ge 10^{-4}$. From now on assume that $N$ is nonempty, then $|N| =400 - 2n \ge 2$. Since there are no $n_1, n_2 \in N$ and $i \in \{1,\dots,n\}$ with $v_1-v_i, v_2 - w_i$ it follows that for each edge $v_iw_i$ the number of edges from $N$ into $v_iw_i$ is at most $400-2n$. Now we sum along the edges of the matching as before, the number of edges counted $1\times$ is $\le (401-2n)n$ so that the total sum of edge weights is $$\ge \frac{n-(401-2n)n}{2} = (n-200)n \ge -10^4,$$as desired.
23.05.2020 15:22
@stroller: Splendid! I admit, I gave a try, but didn't manage to finish it. So, the idea is to take the largest matching and count the tagged numbers on the cuttlefishes of the connected pairs. I put some more explanations on the above solution in my blog.
25.05.2020 01:19
wow thanks for confirming this... the problem is quite a hit-or-miss