Let $ n$ be an integer, $ n\geq 2$. Find all sets $ A$ with $ n$ integer elements such that the sum of any nonempty subset of $ A$ is not divisible by $ n+1$.
Problem
Source: Romanian TST 1 2008, Problem 1
Tags: modular arithmetic, number theory, relatively prime, combinatorics proposed, combinatorics
01.05.2008 23:45
15.09.2008 13:59
Let A= ( a1,a2,a3,……..,an ) Consider the sums a 1 a 1+a2 a 1+a2+a3 . . . . a1+a2+a3+……+an All these sums must have different non –zero remainders on division by n+1. Because if we assume two sums to have the same remainder on division by n+1 , then their difference, which is also a subset of A, would have to be divisible by n+1. Similarly, considering the sums a 2 a 1+a2 a 1+a2+a3 . . . . a1+a2+a3+……+an it could be proved that a1= a2 (mod n+1) Similarly, it could be proved that all members of A belong to the same residue class modulo n+1. Now let the remainder of these numbers on division by n+1 be r If gcd(n+1,r)=d>1, then there exists a positive integer s<n+1 such that sd=n+1 implying that n+1 divides sr which implies that the sum of any s members is divisible by n+1. Hence, A is such that all of its elements produce the same remainders on division by n+1 and this remainder is relatively prime to n+1. Also , if r were relatively prime to n+1 , then none of the numbers sr ; s<n+1 are divisible by n+1 Sorry about the notations, i couldn't use subscripts
11.07.2011 17:00
Sorry to revive this old thread, but the problem has made some reappearance(s), and a full clear solution is now found at http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=417536&p=2353838#p2353838. Moreover, the original statement of the problem was using a multiset of $n$ integers (which thus were not necessarily required be distinct), with exactly the same conclusion, since just divisibility (and not equality) is involved.