Problem
Source: IMO ShortList 2002, geometry problem 2
Tags: geometry, homothety, inequalities, geometric inequality, Triangle, IMO Shortlist
28.09.2004 15:47
Please post your solutions. This is just a solution template to write up your solutions in a nice way and formatted in LaTeX. But maybe your solution is so well written that this is not required finally. For more information and instructions regarding the ISL/ILL problems please look here: introduction for the IMO ShortList/LongList project and regardingsolutions
28.09.2004 23:28
Sorry if it's a bit murky. I remember posting this one too, and giving a solution I was proud of (can't remember if I actually posted it). However, I can't find that solution.. [Moderator edit: This was at http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=220 .] Let D′,E′ be the images of D,E through the homothety of center F and ratio 4. We have to show that D′E′≤AB+AC, so it would be enough to show AE′+AD′≤AB+AC. Again, we notice that it's enough to show AD′≤AC (∗). Let X be the vertex of the equilateral triangle CAX, lying on the opposite side of CA as B. Clearly, AX=AC, so (∗) is equivalent to FD′≤FX=FA+FC (the last equality is well-known, and it follows from Ptolemy's equality applied to the cyclic quadrilateral AFCX) or, in other words, 4FD≤FA+FC. In terms of areas, this means 4S(FAC)≤S(AFCX)⟺3S(FAC)≤S(XAC), and this is clear since for fixed XAC, the area FAC reaches its maximum when FA=FC, and in this case we have equality in the above inequality. I think this pretty much ends the proof: we have shown that 4FD≤FX, which is, as we have shown, equivalent to the initial problem.
17.05.2007 22:14
I saw this problem these days and I was pretty sure it was an ISL problem. Lets take the equilateral triangles ACP and ABQ on the exterior of the triangle ABC. We have that ∠APC+∠AFC=180, therefore the points A,P,F,C are concyclic. But ∠AFP=∠ACP=60=∠AFD, so D∈(FP). Analoguosly we have that E∈(FQ). Now observe that FPFD=1+DPFD=1+[APC][AFC]≥4, and the equality occurs when F is the midpoint of ^AC. Therefore FD≤14FP, and FE≤14FQ. So, by taking it metrical, we have that: DE=√FD2+FE2+FD⋅FE≤14⋅√FP2+FQ2+FP⋅FQ=14PQ But PQ≤AP+AQ=AB+AC, and thus the problem is solved.
27.03.2014 20:45
This post was also a spam and as I am unable to delete this post,i am writing the proof of [APC][AFC]≥3. Note that (AF−CF)2≥0⇒AF2+CF2+AF∗CF≥3AF∗CF⇒AC2≥3AF∗CF⇒AP∗CPsin60∘≥3AF∗CFsin120∘⇒[APC][AFC]≥3.
21.06.2014 20:33
This is a really nice problem! Thanks to sayantanchakraborty for giving some crucial hints leading to the following solution. Since ∠BFC,∠CFA,∠AFB are all equal and sum up to 360∘, they must each be equal to 120∘. Construct a point B′ outside △ABC such that △ABB′ is equilateral. Define point C′ analogously. Since ∠AB′B+∠AFB=60∘+120∘=180∘, points A,B′,B,P are concyclic. Furthermore, since ∠B′FB=∠B′AB=60∘=180∘−∠BFC, points C,F,D,B′ are collinear. I claim that FB′≥4FD. This is equivalent to [△AB′C]≥3[△APC]⟺AB′⋅B′C⋅sin(60∘)≥3⋅AF⋅CF⋅sin(120∘)⟺AB′⋅B′C≥3⋅AF⋅CF. By cosine rule on △AB′C, AC2=AB′2+B′C2−2⋅AB′⋅B′C⋅cos(60∘)=AB′2+B′C2−AB′⋅B′C≥AB′⋅B′C, where we have used the trivial inequality AB′2+B′C2≥2⋅AB′⋅B′C. Hence, it suffices to show that AC2≥3⋅AF⋅CF⟺AF2+CF2−2⋅AF⋅CFcos(120∘)≥3⋅AF⋅CF⟺AF2+CF2≥2⋅AF⋅CF, which is true. Similar arguments show that FC′≥4FE. The rest is obvious. Both the dilations centered at F which map to B to B′ and C to C′ have ratio at least 4, so B′C′≥4DE. By triangle inequality, we have that AB′+A′C≥B′C′⟹AB+AC≥4DE.◼ For equality to hold, we need AF=BF=CF, that is, the Fermat point must be the circumcenter of △ABC. This is possible iff △ABC is equilateral, because ∠AFB=2∠ACB⟹∠ACB=60∘ and similarly ∠ABC=60∘.
02.01.2016 14:37
Erect equilateral triangles AMC and ANC outwardly on the sides of △ABC. It is well known that F∈BM and D∈CN. ◼Lemma 1 1FD=1FA+1FC and 1FE=1FA+1FB . Proof Taking ∠FAC=α and ∠FCA=β and using α+β=60 ,FDFA+FDFC=sin(α)sin(60+β)+sin(β)sin(60+β)=1and other part is analogously proved. ◼Lemma 2 FA+FC≥4FD and FA+FB≥4FE Proof By lemma 1 , FA+FCFD=(1FA+1FC)⋅(FA+FC)≥4⟹FA+FC≥4FD The other part follows analogously. Using lemma 2 AB+AC=AN+AM≥MN=√FN2+FM2+FN⋅FM=√(FA+FB)2+(FA+FC)2+(FA+FB)⋅(FA+FC)≥4⋅√FC2+FD2+FC⋅FD=4DE
19.05.2016 00:26
Construct equilateral triangles ACX and ABY outside of ABC, so it's well known that BFDX and CFEY are lines. YAFB is cyclic, so consider the tangent at the point T, the antipode of Y, labeled as line ℓ. Note that d(Y,AB):d(Y,ℓ)=3:4, so then FEFY≤14 with equality only when F=T, and similarly FDFX≤14. Let M and N be the points on segments FY and FX, respectively, such that FMFY=14 and FNFX=14. Then since FE≤FM and FD≤FN, DE=√FD2+FE2+FD⋅FE≤√FN2+FM2+FN⋅FM=MN=XY4≤AB+AC4, as desired.
04.04.2017 23:06
cute
30.10.2018 14:31
Trigonometry is the best weapon. orl wrote: Let ABC be a triangle for which there exists an interior point F such that ∠AFB=∠BFC=∠CFA. Let the lines BF and CF meet the sides AC and AB at D and E respectively. Prove that AB+AC≥4DE. Clearly ∠AFB=∠BFC=∠CFA=120o. Now, erect equilateral triangles ABC′,BCA′,CAB′ on the sides, externally. Then AFBC′.AFCB′ are cyclic. Hence, ∠C′FA+∠AFC=∠C′BA+∠AFC=60o+120o=180o, and so C,F,C′ are collinear. We get two more symmetric results and so F is teh Fermat point given by AA′∩BB′∩CC′. Claim: FE:FC′≤1:4. Proof: Ptolemy yields FC′=FA+FB. Hence, it suffices to show FA+FB≥4FELet ∠FAB=x. Then it suffices to show FAFB+1≥4FEFB⇔sin(60o−x)sinx+1≥4sin(60o−x)sin(60o+x)⇔(cosx−√3sinx)2≥0which is true. ◻ Similarly we get FD:FB′≤1:4 and so we get 4DE≤B′C′≤AC′+AB′=AB+AC, as desired. ◼
30.10.2018 20:34
orl wrote: Let ABC be a triangle for which there exists an interior point F such that ∠AFB=∠BFC=∠CFA. Let the lines BF and CF meet the sides AC and AB at D and E respectively. Prove that AB+AC≥4DE. The problem is a masterpiece.
11.11.2019 07:31
30.06.2021 23:43
Construct points X,Y,Z forming equilateral triangles △BCX, △CAY, △ABZ sticking out from the triangle. Evidently, F is the intersection of the three circumcircles of these equilateral triangles. Observe additionally that F∈¯AX, and in particular F is the concurrence point of ¯AX, ¯BY, and ¯CZ. Note now that ∠DFE=∠BFC=120∘. Thus, we can calculate DE2=DF2+FE2−2⋅DF⋅FE⋅cos120∘=DF2+FE2+DF⋅FE.As F varies along (ABZ) with length AB fixed, note that the maximum length of FE occurs when ¯FZ⊥¯AB, and this is also the case for the minimum length of FZ. Thus FEFZ≤14. As a result, we know DE2=DF2+FE2+DF⋅FE≤116(FZ2+FY2+FZ⋅FY)=116YZ2≤116(AZ+AY)2=116(AB+AC)2,as desired.
17.07.2021 08:24
Solved with Alex Zhao, Elliott Liu, Connie Jiang, Groovy (\help), Jeffrey Chen, Nicole Shen, and Raymond Feng. Externally construct equilateral triangles ACY and ABZ, so that B, F, D, Y are collinear and C, F, E, Z are collinear. [asy][asy] size(7cm); defaultpen(fontsize(10pt)); pair A,B,C,Y,Z,F,D,EE; A=dir(110); B=dir(220); C=dir(320); Y=A+(C-A)*dir(60); Z=B+(A-B)*dir(60); F=extension(B,Y,C,Z); D=extension(B,Y,A,C); EE=extension(C,Z,A,B); draw(D--EE); draw(B--Y,gray); draw(C--Z,gray); draw(circumcircle(A,F,C),linewidth(.3)); draw(circumcircle(A,F,B),linewidth(.3)); draw(C--Y--A--Z--B); draw(A--B--C--cycle,linewidth(.7)); dot("A",A,dir(105)); dot("B",B,S); dot("C",C,S); dot("F",F,dir(265)); dot("Y",Y,dir(30)); dot("Z",Z,dir(150)); dot("D",D,dir(-5)); dot("E",EE,dir(210)); [/asy][/asy] Observe that FY/FD≥4 and FZ/FE≥4. It follows that AB+AC=AY+AZ≥YZ=√FY2+FZ2+FY⋅FZ≥4√FD2+FE2+FD⋅FE=4DE,as needed.
19.07.2021 09:31
orl wrote: Let ABC be a triangle for which there exists an interior point F such that ∠AFB=∠BFC=∠CFA. Let the lines BF and CF meet the sides AC and AB at D and E respectively. Prove that AB+AC≥4DE. See also here https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6t243f6h2624066_a_refinement_of_imo_shl_2002
16.10.2021 05:10
First ISL solution in a while. This is the type of problem where if you don't know this property of the Fermat point it's hard to solve (I certainly couldn't do it) and if you know it it's very quick (after I got a hint with the property I solved it within fifteen minutes). It is well-known that F is the Toricelli/1st Fermat point of △ABC. It is a well-known property of F that if ABG and ACH are equilateral triangles erected outward from AB and AC, respectively, C,F,G are collinear and AGBF is cyclic (similarly B,F,H are collinear and AHCF is cyclic). Notice that as F is on minor arc AB, the minimum possible value of GEEF occurs when F is on the midpoint of the arc, as this maximizes EF and minimizes EG. In that case, it is easy to show that EGEF=3 and thus FGFE=4, hence it must be true that FGFE≥4 and similarly FHFD≥4. Let FG=αFE and FH=βFD, where α,β≥4. Since ∠EFD=120∘, by LoC on △FED we get ED=√FE2+FD2−2FE⋅FDcos120∘=√FE2+FD2+FE⋅FD.Using LoC on △FGH, we get HG=√FG2+FH2−2FG⋅FHcos120∘=√FG2+FH2+FG⋅FH=√(αFE)2+(βFD)2+(αFE)(βFD)=√α2FE2+β2FD2+αβFE⋅FD≥√16FE2+16FD2+16FE⋅FD=4√FE2+FD2+FE⋅FD=4ED. By the Triangle Inequality, AG+AH≥GH≥4ED, finishing the problem.
Attachments:

19.11.2021 08:19
Let B′,C′ be such that ACB′,ABC′ are equilateral. We have that C,F,C′ and B,F,B′ are collinear. Claim: EC′≥3EF Proof: Note that FEC′E=AFAC′sin∠FABsin∠C′AB=AFc2sin∠FAB√3. Let AF=x, BF=y. Note that R, the circumradius of (AFBC′), is equal to c√3. We have 2R=ysin∠FAB⟹sin∠FAB=y2R=√3y2c. So FEC′E=xcyc=xyc2. Observe that c2=x2+y2+xy≥3xy⟹xyc2≤13. So we have FEC′E≤13⟹C′E≥3FE, as claimed. ◻. From the claim, we have DE≤B′C′4≤AB′+AC′4=AB+AC4⟹AB+AC≥4DE, as desired. ◼
10.01.2022 09:00
Note that ∠AFB = ∠BFC = ∠CFA = 120 so making regular triangles with bases AB and AC is a good move. Let S and K be outside ABC such that ABS and ACK are regular triangles. Note that AFBS and AFCK are cyclic. Let O1,O2 be reflections of F across AB and AC. FE/ES = [AFB]/[ABS] = [AO1B]/[ASB] ≤ 1/3 so FS ≥ 4FE. Same way we can prove FK ≥ 4FD. so SK ≥ 4DE and SK ≤ AS + AK = AB + AC. we're Done.
11.01.2022 18:32
Try the refinement https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6t243f6h2624066_a_refinement_of_imo_shl_2002
13.03.2022 06:26
What. Let G be on FD extended such that ∠AGC=60∘. Let H be on FE extended such that ∠AHB=60∘. Note that AFCG is cyclic. Also, ∠AFD=60∘ and ∠CFD=60∘ so ∠CAG=∠ACG=60∘. Thus, ACG is equilateral. Similarly, AHB is equilateral. Now, AB+AC≥HG. Since ∠HFG is obtuse, it suffices to show HF≥4EF and GF≥4DF to prove that HG≥4ED. Note that △HFA∼△HAE by AA so HEHF=(HEHA)2≥(√32)≥34, which implies the result that HF≥4EF. Similarly, GD≥4DF. Now, WLOG suppose the parallel line through E parallel to HG lies outside of △EDF. Then this line intersects FG at J. HG≥EJ≥ED as desired.
08.08.2022 17:37
Construct equilateral triangles △ABX and △ACY outside of △ABC and note that AXBF and AYCF are cyclic. It's easy to see that FX≥4FE and FY≥4FD so by the Law of Cosines we easily obtain XY≥4DE so that AB+AC=AX+AY≥XY≥4DE.We are done. ◼
08.01.2023 23:18
Really cute orl wrote: Let ABC be a triangle for which there exists an interior point F such that ∠AFB=∠BFC=∠CFA. Let the lines BF and CF meet the sides AC and AB at D and E respectively. Prove that AB+AC≥4DE. Draw points K,L such that AKB and ALC are equilateral triangles. Clearly, AFCL,AFBK are cyclic quads, and ∠AFL=∠ACL=180∘−∠AFB=60∘ implies B,F,D,L are collinear. Similarly, C,F,E, and K, are collinear. Now AB+AC=AK+AL≥KL so it suffices to show that DE≤14KL. We will show that FE≤14FK and FD≤14FL. It suffices to prove the following two lemmas to finish: Lemma 1. Point W lies on arc ^YZ of the circumcircle of equilateral triangle XYZ not containing X and line XW meets YZ at point T. Then WX≥4WT. Proof: Indeed, it is enough to show XT≥3WT. Now XT is larger than the X-median of △XYZ and WT is smaller than the length it achieves when W is antipodal to X. For rigour, this follows as XW⋅XT is fixed by shooting lemma. When W is antipodal, equality is achieved, proving the lemma. Lemma 2. In obtuse triangle XYZ with obtuse angle at X, points Y1,Z1 lie on rays XY,XZ such that XY≥4XY1 and XZ≥4XZ1. Then YZ≥4Y1Z1. Proof: Scale by a factor of 4 to assume XY1≤XY and XZ1≤XZ. Now Y1Z1<Y1Z as ∠Y1Z1Z>∠Y1XZ>90∘ and Y1Z<YZ as ∠YY1Z>∠YXZ>90∘, so Y1Z1<YZ unless Y1=Y and Z1=Z, proving the claim. Finally, by combining Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 in triangle FKL for points D and E, the conclusion follows.
18.07.2023 07:12
r poblem Construct equilateral triangles ABX and ACY so that both are not in the of ABC. Then it is well known that A, F, X and B, F, Y are collinear, and moreover AXBF, AYCF are cyclic. Now we can obtain FX≥4FE, FY≥4FD and hence by LOC XY≥4DE. To finish, AB+AC=AX+AY≥XY≥4DEas desired. ◻
12.12.2023 20:30
Point F is First Fermat Point and construction can easily be found from the theorem thonk:/
26.06.2024 22:18
Note F is the Fermat Point. Thus, let X and Y be points such that △ABX and △ACY are equilateral triangles lying outside △ABC. Claim. FX≥4⋅FE and FY≥4⋅FD. Proof. We will prove this with area ratios. Note, AB2=AF2+FB2+AF⋅FB, by Law of Cosines. [AXB][AFB]=√34⋅AB212⋅AF⋅FB⋅sin(120∘)=AF2+FB2+AF⋅FBAF⋅FB=AFFB+FBAF+1≥3.Thus, [AXB]≥3⋅[AFB], thus XE≥3⋅EF and FX≥4⋅FE. Then, FY≥4⋅FD follows, as desired. ◼ Note that by triangle inequality this clearly implies XY≥4⋅DE. But, AB+AC=AX+AY≥XY, by triangle inequality. Therefore AB+BC≥4⋅DE, as desired.
29.11.2024 04:59
Clearly ∠AFB=∠BFC=∠CFA=120∘. Erect equilateral triangles △ACP and △ABQ outside of △ABC. Let AF=x and FB=y. Observe that AFBQ is cyclic as ∠AQB+∠AFB=60∘+120∘=180∘. Thus by Ptolemy on AFBQ, we get FQ=FA+FB=x+y. Since △FAE∼△FQB (by simple angle-chasing), we get FE⋅FQ=FA⋅FB, so FE=FA⋅FBFA+FB=xyx+y. Therefore, FEFQ=xy(x+y)2≤xy4xy=14by AM-GM on the denominator. Similarly, FDFP≤14. Therefore, AB+AC=AQ+AP≥QP≥4DE,as desired.
09.02.2025 01:48
By similar triangles and angle bisector theorem, we may compute EF=AE⋅BFAB=AB⋅AFAF+BF⋅BFAB=AF⋅BFAF+BF.Now let a=AF, b=BF, and c=CF, and observe that EF=aba+b≤a+b4 while FD≤a+c4. From here, it is very much feasible to directly expand (AB+AC)2≥16DE2 using Law of Cosines, but here is a comparatively nicer finish. Erect equilateral triangles BCX, ACY, and ABZ outside triangle ABC such that F=¯AX∩¯BY∩¯CZ, and note that EF≤14FZ, et cetera. So DE2=EF2+DF2+DE⋅EF≤FZ2+FY2+FZ⋅FY16=ZY216≤(AB+AC)216as needed. Remark: For some reason, this felt quite hard for G2.