A prime $p$ has decimal digits $p_{n}p_{n-1} \cdots p_0$ with $p_{n}>1$. Show that the polynomial $p_{n}x^{n} + p_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+ p_{1}x + p_0$ cannot be represented as a product of two nonconstant polynomials with integer coefficients
Problem
Source:
Tags: algebra, polynomial, inequalities, complex analysis, complex numbers, Polynomials
25.05.2007 03:25
Set $x=10$. If the polynomial can be factored into two other polynomials, then $p$ can be expressed as two decimal factors, and so is not prime, a contradiction. This seems really easy. Is there a flaw?
25.05.2007 03:25
Flaw: The decimal factors could be $\pm 1$ or $\pm p$ if you set $x=10$.
25.05.2007 03:25
Indeed, that would be too easy to be true (but I admit it's deceiving). I'm afraid you'll need some complex analysis to kill this one correctly.
26.08.2008 14:32
Peter wrote: Indeed, that would be too easy to be true (but I admit it's deceiving). I'm afraid you'll need some complex analysis to kill this one correctly. Nope,this problem has very elementary solution,if I am not mistaken,it is enough to observe one inequality between roots and coefficients of the given polynomial...
26.08.2008 17:56
Inequalities between complex roots is complex analysis, no? You won't need deep theorems, obviously, since it's from the BaMO.
26.08.2008 18:31
Peter wrote: Inequalities between complex roots is complex analysis, no? You won't need deep theorems, obviously, since it's from the BaMO. Hmm...I didn't know that.Probably I have some misconceptions in definition of complex analysis.I can't figure out what you mean by your last sentence,whatever it means I agree with you,solution is pretty simple... Maybe you would be so kind to post the proof,assuming you have solved this problem.
26.08.2008 20:03
Well I don't even know a definition of complex analyis, but if you do analysis (inequalities) on complex numbers, I'd be inclined to call that complex analysis. Sorry if that's a wrong wording. From Kalva: Quote: If w is a (complex) root of the polynomial, then since each coefficient is at most 9, we have |pn| ≤ 9(1/|w| + 1/|w|2 + ... + 1/|w|n-1). So if |w| ≥ 9, then |pn| ≤ 9(1/9 + 1/81 + ... ) < 9/8. But pn ≥ 2, so we must have |w| < 9. Suppose the polynomial has a factor with integer coefficients (and positive degree less than n). Then Gauss' lemma tells us that it must be a product of two polynomials with integer coefficients (and each with positive degree less than n). Suppose they are f(x) and g(x). Suppose the (complex) roots of f(x) are z1, ... , zm. Then f(x) = A(x - z1) ... (x - zm) with A and integer. Hence |f(10)| = |A| |10 - z1| ... |10 - zm|. But |A| ≥ 1 and each factor |10 - zi| > 10 - 9 = 1. So |f(10)| > 1. Similarly, |g(10)| > 1. But f(10) and g(10) are integers and their product is the prime p. So we have a contradiction. So the polynomial cannot have any such factor. By the way, it is also in the Resources section on this site.
12.06.2013 08:09
Isn't this Cohn's irreducibility criterion?